This entry was posted on February 6, 2011 at 7:46 pm and is filed under Display Deaf. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
I like the term “display deaf”. I suspect that many brands believe they can be a brand by placing brand over substance. In this instance, little wonder that consumers merely gloss over brand collateral. To my mind, a brand must earn its stripes to ever be considered as a brand of relevance.
[…] was an interesting one-liner post on Tim Cohn’s blog yesterday called Display Deaf. He asks a very simple question: why doesn’t an audience respond to brand advertising? He […]
February 7, 2011 at 4:19 am |
I like the term “display deaf”. I suspect that many brands believe they can be a brand by placing brand over substance. In this instance, little wonder that consumers merely gloss over brand collateral. To my mind, a brand must earn its stripes to ever be considered as a brand of relevance.
February 7, 2011 at 7:04 am |
[…] was an interesting one-liner post on Tim Cohn’s blog yesterday called Display Deaf. He asks a very simple question: why doesn’t an audience respond to brand advertising? He […]